Which describes the timing of feedback?

• A. Delayed feedback only after a few weeks.
• B. Timely feedback after performance.
• C. Feedback only during annual evaluations.
• D. Feedback delegated to peers.

Answer: (B)

Feedback should come soon after the action so the observation is still connected to what happened and can be acted on right away. When feedback is timely, the rower can link the specific movement or decision to the guidance, make a quick adjustment, and apply it in the next repetition. In rowing, this means a coach or teammate notes things like blade catch timing or body position within minutes of a piece, so the rower can correct and improve on the very next effort. Delays of weeks or only getting feedback at annual evaluations miss the immediate connection between action and guidance, making it harder to learn and refine technique. Delegating feedback to peers doesn’t inherently ensure it’s delivered in a timely way either. So, timely feedback after performance is the most effective choice.