Which approach best supports re-engagement after repeated absences?

• A. Discuss barriers, set expectations, and establish a plan to re-engage and maintain accountability.
• B. Publicly shame the rower.
• C. Ignore the issue.
• D. Delay any action until the next season.

Answer: (D)

Re-engaging someone after repeated absences works best when you address barriers, set clear expectations, and create a concrete plan with accountability. By starting with a dialogue about what’s making attendance tough, you show support and can tailor solutions—whether schedule conflicts, transportation, or other commitments. Clear expectations help the rower understand what consistent attendance looks like and what the team needs from them. A written or agreed-upon plan provides a roadmap for re-entry, including short-term milestones and opportunities to rebuild momentum. Accountability mechanisms—check-ins, progress reviews, and gentle follow-through—keep the rower on track while staying constructive and encouraging.

Publicly shaming the rower undermines trust and motivation, which makes it harder to re-engage. Ignoring the issue allows the pattern to continue unchecked and misses a chance to provide help. Delaying action until the next season defers support and reduces the opportunity to address issues while they’re still relevant.